German pathologist describes how she came to the conclusion that corona vaccination was associated with a new manifestation of cancer. Ute and Walter have published an atlas documenting vaccine damage
Dear colleague Chandler, thank you for your help in introducing this unique histopathological atlas. A translation into English, French, Spanish and Swedish is in progress and will be published in a few months. With kind regards from Sweden Ute Krüger
Hi there, I found you via Dr Macmillan (VEJON health) today (YouTube) who had a Dr Rory presenting Dr burkharts findings from 2021. (Lymphocyte amok). I'm seeing you be associated with Dr burkharts work, but I'm curious, back then I understood that it was Dr Bhakdi that directed Dr burkhart to stain for cd8+ lymphocytes and find them in histology. But I'm seeing no mention of Dr Bhakdis efforts. The last time ai spoke to him he said he was retired after he exhausted himself from repeating "auto immune attack by killer T lymphocytes" hundreds of times and finding that nobody would repeat what he said. I've been specialising in the lymphocyte immune response since 2020 and warning of this. The planet of doctors all said the immune response would be "antibodies" and spent 4 years complelty ignoring cytotoxic T cells. Additionally you have Dr Dalgleish constantly repeating "T cells exhaustion = cancer" and nobody repeats that either.
I have investigated and discovered why the whole planet (99% of humans) can't comprehend and won't discuss T cells. Only a handful of us can... Most significantly Dr bhakdi, Marc GIRARDOT. Dr John Campbell, Bret Weinstein, and myself. The rest of the experts are all congitively impaired and cannot comprehend that T cells will destroy any cell presenting foreign proteins.
And that all the evidence is in Dr burkharts pathology and has been this entire three years. And can be found in most other mRNA pathology by searching "lymphocyte infiltration".
Not relevant. Dr burkharts pathology shows the T cells attacking and destroying any cell presenting spike. That is THE mechanism of harm. This answer has been available in autopsy proof for four years. The reason the planet can't figure it out is, just like you, everybody HEARS this answer, and then you all collectively decide you know something better. Even the experts investigating unexplained deaths can't figure it out.
1. The first kind is normal and their brains work. They reference Dr burkharts work, and Dr bhakdis, and talk about T cells, lymphocytes. They describe the immune response as the cytotoxic T killer cells . They do articles and presentations explaining the details. We keep repeating these details because they are correct.
There are only 6(?) of us : Dr Arne Burkhart. Dr Sucharicht Bhakdi. Dr Bret Weinstein. Myself. Marc Girardot. Dr Mike Palmer. Dr John Campbell.
2. About 30 doctors in three years have got the answer right ("the immune system attacks") .
3 The other 2 million odd doctors on the planet have no cognitive ability to comprehend T cells attacking. They cannot read "lymphocyte infiltration" in pathology, and they all all jist endlessly guessing and speculating, or hiding away from public discussion.
This entire four years the biggest investigation in history sought to answer the biggest question of all. What is the mechanism hanksn of harm??????? They are all still speculating and guessing.
They are all cognitivly impaired and can't comprehend the obvious answer. Auto immune attack by killer t lymphocytes.
If any one do otr explains this to their audience... 99.999% of people listening simply thank, ignore, change the subject and go back to endless speculation and confusing.
I was the first on the planet to predict that the T cells would attack. Dr burkhart , guided by Dr bhakdi, they were the first famous ones. Then Marc GIRARDOT.
The whole planet has been in a confusing nightmare this entire time simply because 99% of human CANNOT discuss cd8 + cytotoxic T cells. Not even immunologists.
I agree but when Spike IHC is negative, what is the target? Frame shifted deviant S1 proteins but not recognizable with the current crop of ProSci stains?
You said the words!!!!!!!!! NOBODY says the magic words. Wow. Cool.
Ok.
I'm not sure what you mean about "what is the target when spike ihc is negative".
The target that triggers attack and damage Is spike. If no spike. No damage.
The S2 part of the spike, most of us already had T cell memory to. From common colds Oc43 and HKU1. That was established in 2020. Cross reactive T cell immunity.
Will, If the ProSci IHC stains for S1 are negative in areas of high density destructive T-lymphocyte infiltration what is the antigen? Are we to assume the S1 protein(s) have/has 1. been removed already, 2. these are false negatives, or 3. there are additional possibly (frame shifted) proteins being produced? I favor the latter. What is the perivascular Congo Red lighting up? What are your thoughts? Thanks,
I'm not aware of any of that terminology, despite researching this stuff full time for four years.
My understanding however is that the mRNA spike is S1 AND S2.
And that cells express epitopes (small sections of the spike) which are the antigens.
So if you are talking about some experiments where they couldn't find S1, but t cells are attacking...I suppose it could be because epitopes of S2, are expressing via hmcii pathways.
My concern is your brain appears to be going off to look for more answers , when the billing dollar question and answer which Dr burkhart proved, was that if you make spike on cells, the t cells will attack and destroy. Dr burkhart found something like 14/15 had spike presents, and t cells.."lymphocyte amok". Or "lymphocyte infiltration.
You seem to be telling me about studies where the T cells were attacking in absence of spike?
2. They are a rare occurrence, not the norm , like in Dr burkharts work?.
3. This is a distraction from the key topic which is proving how mRNA WITH spike results in T cells attacking.
Therefore, if there are rare occurrences where you are seeing lymphocyte infiltration, in absence of S1... It could be because of endotoxin contaminants... Or something similar.
Your interest in this is like a planet trying to investigate how a gunman mowed down a group of children and it has been proved the gunman had a gun, and the crow all have bullet holes, but what YOU are interested in is some lone person a mile away who also died at the time. And you want to talk about that guy, not the gunman that killed the crowd.
Dear colleague Chandler, thank you for your help in introducing this unique histopathological atlas. A translation into English, French, Spanish and Swedish is in progress and will be published in a few months. With kind regards from Sweden Ute Krüger
Keep up the great work!
Hi there, I found you via Dr Macmillan (VEJON health) today (YouTube) who had a Dr Rory presenting Dr burkharts findings from 2021. (Lymphocyte amok). I'm seeing you be associated with Dr burkharts work, but I'm curious, back then I understood that it was Dr Bhakdi that directed Dr burkhart to stain for cd8+ lymphocytes and find them in histology. But I'm seeing no mention of Dr Bhakdis efforts. The last time ai spoke to him he said he was retired after he exhausted himself from repeating "auto immune attack by killer T lymphocytes" hundreds of times and finding that nobody would repeat what he said. I've been specialising in the lymphocyte immune response since 2020 and warning of this. The planet of doctors all said the immune response would be "antibodies" and spent 4 years complelty ignoring cytotoxic T cells. Additionally you have Dr Dalgleish constantly repeating "T cells exhaustion = cancer" and nobody repeats that either.
I have investigated and discovered why the whole planet (99% of humans) can't comprehend and won't discuss T cells. Only a handful of us can... Most significantly Dr bhakdi, Marc GIRARDOT. Dr John Campbell, Bret Weinstein, and myself. The rest of the experts are all congitively impaired and cannot comprehend that T cells will destroy any cell presenting foreign proteins.
And that all the evidence is in Dr burkharts pathology and has been this entire three years. And can be found in most other mRNA pathology by searching "lymphocyte infiltration".
You are correct that Dr. Bhakdi was in close contact with Dr. Burkhardt. https://doctors4covidethics.org/its-human-responsibility-in-memory-of-prof-dr-arne-burkhardt/
This is important work.
Government, law enforcement and medical institutions have acted badly.
Genocide.
The vaccines were contaminated with something.
The contamination appears to have varied, with different results.
Some vaccine batches appear to have been inert.
Evidence has been destroyed.
Not relevant. Dr burkharts pathology shows the T cells attacking and destroying any cell presenting spike. That is THE mechanism of harm. This answer has been available in autopsy proof for four years. The reason the planet can't figure it out is, just like you, everybody HEARS this answer, and then you all collectively decide you know something better. Even the experts investigating unexplained deaths can't figure it out.
There are 3 kinds of doctors/experts.
1. The first kind is normal and their brains work. They reference Dr burkharts work, and Dr bhakdis, and talk about T cells, lymphocytes. They describe the immune response as the cytotoxic T killer cells . They do articles and presentations explaining the details. We keep repeating these details because they are correct.
There are only 6(?) of us : Dr Arne Burkhart. Dr Sucharicht Bhakdi. Dr Bret Weinstein. Myself. Marc Girardot. Dr Mike Palmer. Dr John Campbell.
2. About 30 doctors in three years have got the answer right ("the immune system attacks") .
3 The other 2 million odd doctors on the planet have no cognitive ability to comprehend T cells attacking. They cannot read "lymphocyte infiltration" in pathology, and they all all jist endlessly guessing and speculating, or hiding away from public discussion.
This entire four years the biggest investigation in history sought to answer the biggest question of all. What is the mechanism hanksn of harm??????? They are all still speculating and guessing.
They are all cognitivly impaired and can't comprehend the obvious answer. Auto immune attack by killer t lymphocytes.
If any one do otr explains this to their audience... 99.999% of people listening simply thank, ignore, change the subject and go back to endless speculation and confusing.
I was the first on the planet to predict that the T cells would attack. Dr burkhart , guided by Dr bhakdi, they were the first famous ones. Then Marc GIRARDOT.
The whole planet has been in a confusing nightmare this entire time simply because 99% of human CANNOT discuss cd8 + cytotoxic T cells. Not even immunologists.
"Auto immune attack by killer t lymphocytes."
I agree but when Spike IHC is negative, what is the target? Frame shifted deviant S1 proteins but not recognizable with the current crop of ProSci stains?
You said the words!!!!!!!!! NOBODY says the magic words. Wow. Cool.
Ok.
I'm not sure what you mean about "what is the target when spike ihc is negative".
The target that triggers attack and damage Is spike. If no spike. No damage.
The S2 part of the spike, most of us already had T cell memory to. From common colds Oc43 and HKU1. That was established in 2020. Cross reactive T cell immunity.
Will, If the ProSci IHC stains for S1 are negative in areas of high density destructive T-lymphocyte infiltration what is the antigen? Are we to assume the S1 protein(s) have/has 1. been removed already, 2. these are false negatives, or 3. there are additional possibly (frame shifted) proteins being produced? I favor the latter. What is the perivascular Congo Red lighting up? What are your thoughts? Thanks,
I'm not aware of any of that terminology, despite researching this stuff full time for four years.
My understanding however is that the mRNA spike is S1 AND S2.
And that cells express epitopes (small sections of the spike) which are the antigens.
So if you are talking about some experiments where they couldn't find S1, but t cells are attacking...I suppose it could be because epitopes of S2, are expressing via hmcii pathways.
My concern is your brain appears to be going off to look for more answers , when the billing dollar question and answer which Dr burkhart proved, was that if you make spike on cells, the t cells will attack and destroy. Dr burkhart found something like 14/15 had spike presents, and t cells.."lymphocyte amok". Or "lymphocyte infiltration.
You seem to be telling me about studies where the T cells were attacking in absence of spike?
Well, sorry, I have no idea about that.
"You seem to be telling me about studies where the T cells were attacking in absence of spike?"
Exactly. There are areas with characteristic histological change from the mRNA drugs in which the S1 stains are negative.
Ok.
Well.
1. I am not aware of those studies.
2. They are a rare occurrence, not the norm , like in Dr burkharts work?.
3. This is a distraction from the key topic which is proving how mRNA WITH spike results in T cells attacking.
Therefore, if there are rare occurrences where you are seeing lymphocyte infiltration, in absence of S1... It could be because of endotoxin contaminants... Or something similar.
Your interest in this is like a planet trying to investigate how a gunman mowed down a group of children and it has been proved the gunman had a gun, and the crow all have bullet holes, but what YOU are interested in is some lone person a mile away who also died at the time. And you want to talk about that guy, not the gunman that killed the crowd.
It's baffling.