Unfortunately the PsyOp currently being perpetrated on its citizens by governments had to target the medical profession early on to succeed. The resultant carnage has yet to be fully appreciated.
Excellent question. Not at all a gotcha. You raise important issues that should not be ignored. Refusal to give up data sets on request is an important topic. You are not the first to run into this roadblock. This matter should be settled in a collegial manner as progress is made through cooperation and competition not suppression.
These are some additional issues I have with the approach used in Denmark 1 and 2. I missed Max’s presentation at D4CE meeting featured in the video, so I missed an opportunity to ask him directly. These are meant to be discussion points.
1. Methodology: log transformation, hierarchical followed by non-hierarchical cluster analysis then linear regression. Does this lead to similar very discrete clusters across multiple data sets? Independent reproducibility is important. What distortions are introduced with this methodology?
2. Why in the regression for the Blue cluster in Denmark #1 are the top four data points not included in the regression? The answer, I believe, has to do with requiring the regression to originate from the 0 point since there can be no SAEs (Deaths, Severe etc.) if no drug is administered. Including those points would move the x-axis intercept into positive territory, i.e., SAEs with no drug administered. I am just putting a ruler on those points and would like to run the numbers to see but without requiring a 0 origin to see if including those four points displaces the x intercept. Is non-linearity involved?
3. The yellow data set in Denmark #1 is hard to explain since there are SAEs, severe SAEs, and deaths in even in saline placebo groups. So, zero SAEs etc. makes no sense to me. Denmark #2 with the steeper slopes points to a process issue. Remember the kerfuffle over the word "placebo"?
4. The 89 cases need to be accounted for. This might tell us more about the international data corruption process. Hopefully you will get the data and sort out what happened.
5. Why are the slopes so different between Sweden and Denmark if there are truly three clusters with very high R2 but vary across countries? There is more going on than batch differences.
6. Why are the death plots unlike the others? Hot lots should have more deaths.
7. How sound are the time series by proxy plots since the date of release is not the date of administration? US vaxx administration data is highly granular, by daily by county as I remember. Fortunately, I was able to locate CDC data by month of administration for my time series analysis.
My takeaways: Early batches were very dirty and had a profound affect on women. (Geoff Pain just posted a piece on this topic) I believe this is because Process 2 produced a new drug formulation that had very limited testing and something in the formulation changed, other than the shift to a Tris buffer.
BioNTech/PFE knew from animal testing with BNT162b1 and the many versions of BNT162b2 through version 9 that the different formulations produced significant differences in “reactogenicity”. This is documented in the preclinical and phase 1 studies. Reactogenicity in some/many cases foretells significant health problems downstream (my opinion).
The final point is that the Denmark study was intended as preliminary to hypothesis testing research design. Unfortunately, governments around the world have taken away our most powerful tools to study the effects of these drugs leaving us with these flawed passive databases.
Jim, you made my day. I am inspired to finish work on a draft article on Covid 19 “vaccines” and catastrophic brain bleeding with autopsy findings in cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage. I will send it off to my co-authors in Europe for their revisions and hope to post it soon. Thank you for reading!
My professional career was with Walgreens and I contributed to the building of the chain which has lost it's way. There is a movement afoot to by pass drug stores (pharmacists) in their role to monitor and control the proper prescribing and dispensing of prescription medicine. Lilly and Pfizer are at the forefront and Amazon is digging in. They are using AI to determine if you are a candidate for a drug.
Selling directly to the consumer. Our NIH is dead on their feet including the FDA. So is NACDS that is suppose to represent the role of drug chains.
Pharmacists are vital members of the medical team and assist greatly in management of complex hospital cases. Loss of their independence is a tragic consequence of the corporate/government hijacking of medicine. The business model of Rite Aid/CVS/Walgreens does not look viable to me. Big stores packed with sundry consumer products ties up an enormous amount of working capital. Some of the systems they have developed are worthwhile and should be preserved. The relationship between pharmacist, patient and doctor must be strengthened and not crushed. The handling of Ivermectin and HCQ was disheartening.
There is no medical ethics left. To mandate dangerous Cvax drugs with no concluded real evidence proving safety when inexpensive remedies were denied is in my eyes criminal. EUA was a complete scam. Then telling us masks, social distancing, closing most places was necessary to stop the spread when almost everyone I know got covid anyway some multiple times is mind boggling. There are people that died and are still unhealthy as a direct result of these dangerous jabs. More to come I’m afraid. It was a deceitful way to depopulate. When are people gonna understand what was done to us? Maybe never! Too many lies but some are so very obvious. I do think some are waking up. Not enough…..eyes wide open…..👁️👁️
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Wait until Japan releases its mRNA Replicon next month. The entire planet is going to be obliterated - all species will be nuked.
Japan`s plan to destroy the world:
If you thought nuclear weapons were bad, imagine one that lasts 1000 years - The mRNA Replicon
Personally my trust in the medical profession took a hit in the years prior to the pandemic when in 2018 the AMA, the supposed "premier national physician organization in the country" came out with its stance that gender is fluid - quoting board member William E. Kobler, MD who stated "Sex and gender are more complex than previously assumed." WTH? What happened to science?
Its horrendous performance during the pandemic and since merely added distrust and disgust to the vile vial that is today's medical industry. Despite what we though we knew, it turns out that it's just a business which (together with ruthless big pharma; their combined capture of the three letter agencies and the media; much of government and "higher" education, and its relentless squashing of any dissent) has left no question as to what they're all about and where their motives lie. I'm all for profit so long as it doesn't literally hurt people. Do no harm? This industry in maiming and killing!
By comparison, the endeavors of Tobacco Industry of yesteryear were child's play. Now, clearly among the worst of the worst, that "gender fluidity" thing today rears its transitioning head as a multi-billion dollar industry with a hefty if not healthy compound annual growth rate of 11.25% anticipated for 2023 to 2030. With apologies to you and the relative handful of docs that really care, the "industry" is disgusting and I'm afraid beyond repair.
I share your disdain for the AMA. Other than some of their publications the AMA has been totally irrelevant for in my view, particularly for surgeons.
Covid may have been the first time in history that government forced physicians to neglect their sick patients. Some doctors were totally on board with the measures but there was a huge element of deceit involved as well as intimidation and coercion. The medical literature produced by advocates was carefully written to mislead. It takes many hours to critically read the medical literature.
Free tissue transfer was very much a part of my practice. An example is coverage of traumatic soft tissue defects which occur mostly below the knee and are found in high energy injuries associated with fractures of various complexity.
We have developed staged surgical reconstructions that can salvage badly damaged extremities using free tissue transfer of serratus anterior from the back, rectus abdominus or gracillis but with the knowledge that the transferred tissue will never have any function other than soft tissue coverage. Micro-vascular surgeons connect 1 mm. vessels to the transplanted muscle. The anastomosis sometimes clots off and the graft is lost. Not only is the transplant lost but there is significant permanent donor site morbidity.
Bottom surgery is plain horrific and should not be done. Three normal regions of the body are irreparably damaged; 1. transferred tissue donor site, 2. implantation site and 3. full thickness graft site. This is unforgivable.
Meanwhile, the patient is left with need to do life long catherizations to maintain urinary flow in some/many cases. The transplanted tissue does not have anything like normal function.
Sadly I wholeheartedly agree with you. It took me until late 2020 for me to realise I could not trust doctors when they essentially failed to disgnose the causes of my facial palsy.
In the UK we have a phrase 'load of old cobblers' meaning 'rubbish'. So the AMA is talking a load of old Koblers instead!
I don't think there is much good left in 'medical practice'. Anagramming those two words we get 'malpracticed' as one of two longest words. A full phrase is 'ice malpracticed' which sounds ominous. Reminds me of the words 'the love of many will grow cold'.
Her family said she did not. But she received a blood transfusion shortly after being admitted to the hospital, so her blood is likely to be contaminated now, which makes it so much worse.
Her antibody tests should tell us. If she has nucleocapsid antibodies she had SARS-CoV-2/Covid19. If she has Spike antibodies only she was vaccinated. If she has Spike + nucleocapsid antibodies then she might have had both or SC2/C19 only.
Does anyone recall the 'purge' that happened in the run up to covid. 2018-2019 saw a mass exodus of people from the work arena. Anyone with even a shred of integrity was removed from the work force across the spectrum, professionals and laymen alike. Furloughed, retired, forcibly retired, many bought campers or renovated buses and headed for the hills, so to speak. Never before in American history has there been such an exodus of the working class. Anyone remember that?
I am in the UK and I am not aware of anything similar except I think a lot of raw police recruits were taken on. Having had some experience of them, I consider them to be ill trained at best, mini Hitlers at worse.
I have seen with my own eyes police wearing masks outside then taking them off in a vehicle. They were exempt from the so called regulations so were complicit in the scam.
Yo Dr. Chandler, what do you think of the 89 deaths in VAERS against the harmless "yellow" batches? At least 7 of those deaths coming from Denmark. I say "at least" because as you know since Nov 2022 two-digit country code was stripped out VAERS.
Please don't take this as a gotcha question, I'm just wondering if you think these death reports in VAERS via EMA/Eudravigilance and manufacturer somehow bi-passed whatever data the Denmark team obtained?
Excellent question. Not at all a gotcha. You raise important issues that should not be ignored. Refusal to give up data sets on request is an important topic. You are not the first to run into this roadblock. This matter should be settled in a collegial manner as progress is made through cooperation and competition not suppression.
These are some additional issues I have with the approach used in Denmark 1 and 2. I missed Max’s presentation at D4CE meeting featured in the video, so I missed an opportunity to ask him directly. These are meant to be discussion points.
1. Methodology: log transformation, hierarchical followed by non-hierarchical cluster analysis then linear regression. Does this lead to similar very discrete clusters across multiple data sets? Independent reproducibility is important. What distortions are introduced with this methodology?
2. Why in the regression for the Blue cluster in Denmark #1 are the top four data points not included in the regression? The answer, I believe, has to do with requiring the regression to originate from the 0 point since there can be no SAEs (Deaths, Severe etc.) if no drug is administered. Including those points would move the x-axis intercept into positive territory, i.e., SAEs with no drug administered. I am just putting a ruler on those points and would like to run the numbers to see but without requiring a 0 origin to see if including those four points displaces the x intercept. Is non-linearity involved?
3. The yellow data set in Denmark #1 is hard to explain since there are SAEs, severe SAEs, and deaths in even in saline placebo groups. So, zero SAEs etc. makes no sense to me. Denmark #2 with the steeper slopes points to a process issue. Remember the kerfuffle over the word "placebo"?
4. The 89 cases need to be accounted for. This might tell us more about the international data corruption process. Hopefully you will get the data and sort out what happened.
5. Why are the slopes so different between Sweden and Denmark if there are truly three clusters with very high R2 but vary across countries? There is more going on than batch differences.
6. Why are the death plots unlike the others? Hot lots should have more deaths.
7. How sound are the time series by proxy plots since the date of release is not the date of administration? US vaxx administration data is highly granular, by daily by county as I remember. Fortunately, I was able to locate CDC data by month of administration for my time series analysis.
My takeaways: Early batches were very dirty and had a profound affect on women. (Geoff Pain just posted a piece on this topic) I believe this is because Process 2 produced a new drug formulation that had very limited testing and something in the formulation changed, other than the shift to a Tris buffer.
BioNTech/PFE knew from animal testing with BNT162b1 and the many versions of BNT162b2 through version 9 that the different formulations produced significant differences in “reactogenicity”. This is documented in the preclinical and phase 1 studies. Reactogenicity in some/many cases foretells significant health problems downstream (my opinion).
The final point is that the Denmark study was intended as preliminary to hypothesis testing research design. Unfortunately, governments around the world have taken away our most powerful tools to study the effects of these drugs leaving us with these flawed passive databases.
Bob, we are all thankful for your thorough research into this debacle. You, Malone and Wolfe have opened my eyes and heart (pun intended).
Jim S
Jim, you made my day. I am inspired to finish work on a draft article on Covid 19 “vaccines” and catastrophic brain bleeding with autopsy findings in cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage. I will send it off to my co-authors in Europe for their revisions and hope to post it soon. Thank you for reading!
My professional career was with Walgreens and I contributed to the building of the chain which has lost it's way. There is a movement afoot to by pass drug stores (pharmacists) in their role to monitor and control the proper prescribing and dispensing of prescription medicine. Lilly and Pfizer are at the forefront and Amazon is digging in. They are using AI to determine if you are a candidate for a drug.
Selling directly to the consumer. Our NIH is dead on their feet including the FDA. So is NACDS that is suppose to represent the role of drug chains.
Pharmacists are vital members of the medical team and assist greatly in management of complex hospital cases. Loss of their independence is a tragic consequence of the corporate/government hijacking of medicine. The business model of Rite Aid/CVS/Walgreens does not look viable to me. Big stores packed with sundry consumer products ties up an enormous amount of working capital. Some of the systems they have developed are worthwhile and should be preserved. The relationship between pharmacist, patient and doctor must be strengthened and not crushed. The handling of Ivermectin and HCQ was disheartening.
There is no medical ethics left. To mandate dangerous Cvax drugs with no concluded real evidence proving safety when inexpensive remedies were denied is in my eyes criminal. EUA was a complete scam. Then telling us masks, social distancing, closing most places was necessary to stop the spread when almost everyone I know got covid anyway some multiple times is mind boggling. There are people that died and are still unhealthy as a direct result of these dangerous jabs. More to come I’m afraid. It was a deceitful way to depopulate. When are people gonna understand what was done to us? Maybe never! Too many lies but some are so very obvious. I do think some are waking up. Not enough…..eyes wide open…..👁️👁️
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Wait until Japan releases its mRNA Replicon next month. The entire planet is going to be obliterated - all species will be nuked.
Japan`s plan to destroy the world:
If you thought nuclear weapons were bad, imagine one that lasts 1000 years - The mRNA Replicon
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/japans-plan-to-destroy-the-world
Personally my trust in the medical profession took a hit in the years prior to the pandemic when in 2018 the AMA, the supposed "premier national physician organization in the country" came out with its stance that gender is fluid - quoting board member William E. Kobler, MD who stated "Sex and gender are more complex than previously assumed." WTH? What happened to science?
Its horrendous performance during the pandemic and since merely added distrust and disgust to the vile vial that is today's medical industry. Despite what we though we knew, it turns out that it's just a business which (together with ruthless big pharma; their combined capture of the three letter agencies and the media; much of government and "higher" education, and its relentless squashing of any dissent) has left no question as to what they're all about and where their motives lie. I'm all for profit so long as it doesn't literally hurt people. Do no harm? This industry in maiming and killing!
By comparison, the endeavors of Tobacco Industry of yesteryear were child's play. Now, clearly among the worst of the worst, that "gender fluidity" thing today rears its transitioning head as a multi-billion dollar industry with a hefty if not healthy compound annual growth rate of 11.25% anticipated for 2023 to 2030. With apologies to you and the relative handful of docs that really care, the "industry" is disgusting and I'm afraid beyond repair.
I share your disdain for the AMA. Other than some of their publications the AMA has been totally irrelevant for in my view, particularly for surgeons.
Covid may have been the first time in history that government forced physicians to neglect their sick patients. Some doctors were totally on board with the measures but there was a huge element of deceit involved as well as intimidation and coercion. The medical literature produced by advocates was carefully written to mislead. It takes many hours to critically read the medical literature.
Free tissue transfer was very much a part of my practice. An example is coverage of traumatic soft tissue defects which occur mostly below the knee and are found in high energy injuries associated with fractures of various complexity.
We have developed staged surgical reconstructions that can salvage badly damaged extremities using free tissue transfer of serratus anterior from the back, rectus abdominus or gracillis but with the knowledge that the transferred tissue will never have any function other than soft tissue coverage. Micro-vascular surgeons connect 1 mm. vessels to the transplanted muscle. The anastomosis sometimes clots off and the graft is lost. Not only is the transplant lost but there is significant permanent donor site morbidity.
Bottom surgery is plain horrific and should not be done. Three normal regions of the body are irreparably damaged; 1. transferred tissue donor site, 2. implantation site and 3. full thickness graft site. This is unforgivable.
Meanwhile, the patient is left with need to do life long catherizations to maintain urinary flow in some/many cases. The transplanted tissue does not have anything like normal function.
Sterilization and mutilation is the result.
Sadly I wholeheartedly agree with you. It took me until late 2020 for me to realise I could not trust doctors when they essentially failed to disgnose the causes of my facial palsy.
In the UK we have a phrase 'load of old cobblers' meaning 'rubbish'. So the AMA is talking a load of old Koblers instead!
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/the-five-rules-of-propaganda-and?utm_source=publication-search
I don't think there is much good left in 'medical practice'. Anagramming those two words we get 'malpracticed' as one of two longest words. A full phrase is 'ice malpracticed' which sounds ominous. Reminds me of the words 'the love of many will grow cold'.
I wonder whether the unfortunate girl had the covid jabs before these three.
Her family said she did not. But she received a blood transfusion shortly after being admitted to the hospital, so her blood is likely to be contaminated now, which makes it so much worse.
Her antibody tests should tell us. If she has nucleocapsid antibodies she had SARS-CoV-2/Covid19. If she has Spike antibodies only she was vaccinated. If she has Spike + nucleocapsid antibodies then she might have had both or SC2/C19 only.
Does anyone recall the 'purge' that happened in the run up to covid. 2018-2019 saw a mass exodus of people from the work arena. Anyone with even a shred of integrity was removed from the work force across the spectrum, professionals and laymen alike. Furloughed, retired, forcibly retired, many bought campers or renovated buses and headed for the hills, so to speak. Never before in American history has there been such an exodus of the working class. Anyone remember that?
I am in the UK and I am not aware of anything similar except I think a lot of raw police recruits were taken on. Having had some experience of them, I consider them to be ill trained at best, mini Hitlers at worse.
I have seen with my own eyes police wearing masks outside then taking them off in a vehicle. They were exempt from the so called regulations so were complicit in the scam.
Yo Dr. Chandler, what do you think of the 89 deaths in VAERS against the harmless "yellow" batches? At least 7 of those deaths coming from Denmark. I say "at least" because as you know since Nov 2022 two-digit country code was stripped out VAERS.
https://welcometheeagle.substack.com/p/more-denmark-batch-dependent-hotplacebo
Please don't take this as a gotcha question, I'm just wondering if you think these death reports in VAERS via EMA/Eudravigilance and manufacturer somehow bi-passed whatever data the Denmark team obtained?
Alberto, I replied. It looks like my reply was not posted under your comment so look for it.
Found it. Thanks